Add Siesta campaign

This commit is contained in:
Deborah Servili 2019-02-11 16:30:46 +01:00
parent 233b7f3aff
commit 8aeed60a24
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 7E3A832850D4D7D1

View file

@ -999,7 +999,8 @@
"refs": [
"http://researchcenter.paloaltonetworks.com/2017/02/unit42-menupass-returns-new-malware-new-attacks-japanese-academics-organizations/",
"https://www.cfr.org/interactive/cyber-operations/apt-10",
"https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/content/files/protected_files/article_files/Joint%20report%20on%20publicly%20available%20hacking%20tools%20%28NCSC%29.pdf"
"https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/content/files/protected_files/article_files/Joint%20report%20on%20publicly%20available%20hacking%20tools%20%28NCSC%29.pdf",
"https://www.pwc.co.uk/cyber-security/pdf/cloud-hopper-report-final-v4.pdf"
],
"synonyms": [
"APT10",
@ -6221,6 +6222,16 @@
},
"uuid": "c2c64bd3-a325-446f-91a8-b4c0f173a30b",
"value": "APT39"
},
{
"description": "FireEye recently looked deeper into the activity discussed in TrendMicros blog and dubbed the “Siesta” campaign. The tools, modus operandi, and infrastructure used in the campaign present two possibilities: either the Chinese cyber-espionage unit APT1 is perpetrating this activity, or another group is using the same tactics and tools as the legacy APT1.\nThe Siesta campaign reinforces the fact that analysts and network defenders should remain on the lookout for known, public indicators and for shared attributes that allow security experts to detect multiple actors with one signature.",
"meta": {
"refs": [
"https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2014/03/a-detailed-examination-of-the-siesta-campaign.html"
]
},
"uuid": "27c97181-b8e9-43e1-93c0-f953cac45326",
"value": "Siesta"
}
],
"version": 89